Commentary
ON THE FEAST by Fr. Frank Doyle, S.J.
Genesis
14:18-20; 1 Corinthians
11:23-26;
Luke 9:11b-17
IN
A WAY, WE HAVE ALREADY CELEBRATED this feast. We did so on Holy
Thursday in Holy Week. On that occasion, the emphasis was on the
institution, the gift of the Eucharist to us, as one of Jesus’ last
acts before His suffering and death. It was, moreover, to be an
enduring memorial of that great liberating act by which God’s love
would be forever kept before our minds.
One
reason why we may have this second feast of the Eucharist is that -
it takes place during the more joyful period of the Easter season,
when we can celebrate it with greater freedom from the constraints of
Lent and Holy Week. In many parts of the world, there will be a
solemn and joyful procession of the Blessed Sacrament through the
parish grounds or even through the public streets.
Community
dimension
Perhaps,
today we should emphasize more the community
dimension
of the celebration of the Eucharist, which is often missing. We tend
to see “going to Mass” very much in individual terms. If “I”
fail to “go to Mass” through “my own fault”, “I” have
committed a mortal sin. We also tend to talk about “hearing”
Mass, or being “at Mass”. We ask questions like: “Who said the
Mass?” The priest himself may even be heard to announce: “I am
saying this Mass for the repose of the soul of…” or even “I am
saying this Mass for all of you here”.
On
reflection, these expressions are very strange. They tend to present
the Eucharist as something that the priest alone does on behalf of
other people.
People seem to feel themselves present at a performance in which they
are only expected to be physically present. This is sometimes further
accentuated by a choir doing all the singing (that is, if there is
singing), and a “commentator” shouting out all the prayers over
the microphone. Quite a number of people come in late and many leave
before the end. These things are all so common that we hardly notice
them. We may even accept these things as the way things should be.
But it tells us a lot about what it means to people to be present (or
not present) at the Eucharist.
Active
participation
The
Eucharist is essentially and of its very nature, a community action
in which every person present is expected to be an active
participant.
We are
here, on the one hand, recalling what makes us Christians in the
first place – our identification with the life, suffering, death
and resurrection of Jesus. And that identification with Jesus is
expressed not through a one-to-one relationship with Him, but in a
community relationship with Him present in all those who call
themselves Christian. We relate to Him through his Risen Body, which
is the whole community bearing His Name. There is no place in
Christianity for individualism. It is a horizontal faith: we go to
God with and through those around us.
Every
Lord’s Day we come together as that Body, as a community, to say
thanks to Him, and hence, the name “Eucharist” which means
“thanks”. It
is regrettable, then, if we are only in church to “keep the Third
Commandment” on a purely private, individual, devotional basis.
With that mentality, it will not be surprising if we think it does
not matter if we are late or leave early. Because,
with that mentality, “going to Mass” is a private affair for me
and all the others who “happen” to be there, too.
Some
even resent that there is too much going on. They wonder why they
cannot be “left in peace to say their prayers”. It is true some
Mass celebrations can be overactive or over-intrusive but, on the
other hand, it is not a time for contemplative prayer. One can do
that much better at home. The whole point of being at Mass is to
celebrate together with one’s fellow-Christians as a community of
the disciples of Jesus.
Eating
together
As
well as remembering and giving thanks as a community, as the Body of
Christ, the Eucharist is also a time when we express that unity
through the eating and drinking together of that Body.
The
key to our being in Christ is love; love not only for God, but for
every single person. Jesus said that the two ways by which it would
be known publicly that we live in Him would be, by our love for each
other and the unity which follows from that. “By this will all know
that you are my disciples, that you have love for one another”
(John 13:35) and “May they all be one… may they be so completely
one that the world will realize that it was You [the Father] who sent
me” (John 17:21,23).
This,
of course, we are to manifest first and foremost by the way we live
our daily lives. And one of the reasons we may find it difficult to
express ourselves as community during Mass, is because we do not have
that deep down sense of togetherness as Christians in general. Mass
is not the time to
manufacture
community;
rather, it
is the time to celebrate it.
Unfortunately, past emphasis on individual morality as the key to
“saving my soul” still runs deep several decades after the Second
Vatican Council. As
a result, we come into the church on Sunday largely as strangers to
each other.
Stiff
and formal
Not
surprisingly, the “sign of peace” is, in many cases, hardly a
warm-hearted act of reconciliation and friendship, but a stiff and
formal bowing in which some people decline to take part.
Communion
can be seen primarily as “receiving Jesus in my heart”. I close
my eyes lest I might be “distracted” by the people around me. The
choir sings on my behalf while I make “my thanksgiving”.
Certainly reverence and prayer have their place at Communion time, as
throughout the Eucharist. But we need to remember, too, that we are
taking part in the joyful celebration of a community of brothers and
sisters. This communion calls for sharing and communication and even
a certain level of spontaneity and naturalness.
“Going
to communion” is not a private “receiving” but a sharing, an
eating together of the one Bread and the shared drinking of the one
Cup. This one Bread and one Cup represent Jesus in his Risen Body; it
includes not only Jesus but the whole community present. We recognize
in the sharing not just the individual Jesus coming to me but Jesus
in his Body, of which we are all part.
Jesus
is in the host but He is also in the hand that gives the host and in
the hand of the one who receives.
There are some ultra-devotional people who genuflect just before
receiving. By right, they should also genuflect to the whole
congregation because that is where the real presence of Christ is. If
Jesus is not present by faith and action in this community, what
meaning can the Eucharist have?
Eucharistic
ministers
Hence
the meaningfulness now in some parishes of having the induction of
lay Eucharistic ministers on this day. We have moved from a purely
priest-centered Eucharist, at which the laity are passive spectators,
to one that is community-centered - because that is where Christ is
to be found. The priest still has his role, of course, as the one who
presides. He
is the focal point of unity around which the community gathers but it
is the community, including the priest, who celebrates.
These
ministers may also be bringing the Eucharist to the sick and the
housebound. This is, too, an extension of the community celebration
of the Eucharist. Our sick brothers and sisters cannot come
personally to the community celebration, but they are reminded of
their membership when they share the same Body of Christ, which binds
all together. In communion, not just Jesus, but the whole parish
comes to them.
Photo Courtesy: John Andrew C. Libao (National Shrine and Parish of St. Anne)
Photo Courtesy: John Andrew C. Libao (National Shrine and Parish of St. Anne)
No comments:
Post a Comment